CACLR

Cumulative Adjacent Channel Leakage Ratio

Physical Layer →
Introduced in Rel-10

CACLR is the 3GPP metric measuring the total unwanted transmitter power leakage into multiple adjacent radio channels relative to the power in its own assigned channel.

Category
Physical Layer
Introduced
Rel-10
Where
Radio Access Network › NG-RAN (5G)
Specifications
20 specs
CACLR Description Purpose Related Classification Detected Changes Specifications

Description

Cumulative Adjacent Channel Leakage Ratio (CACLR) is a stringent radio frequency (RF) conformance test parameter defined in 3GPP specifications for base stations (Node B, eNB, gNB) and user equipment. It quantifies the transmitter's ability to confine its emitted power within its allocated channel bandwidth, specifically by measuring the aggregate leakage power that spills over into a defined set of adjacent frequency channels. Unlike the simpler Adjacent Channel Leakage Ratio (ACLR), which typically considers only the first adjacent channel, CACLR sums the leakage power across several adjacent channels (e.g., the first, second, and sometimes third adjacent channels) and compares this cumulative unwanted power to the power in the main transmitted channel. This provides a more comprehensive assessment of a transmitter's spectral purity and its potential to cause wideband interference.

The measurement methodology for CACLR is detailed in 3GPP TS 25.104, 36.104, and 38.104 for UTRA, E-UTRA, and NR respectively. The test setup involves a calibrated signal analyzer or a specialized test receiver. The device under test transmits a standardized test signal at a specified output power. The receiver then measures the power within the bandwidth of the assigned channel (P_assigned) and the integrated power within the bandwidths of the specified adjacent channels (P_adj1, P_adj2, ...). The CACLR is then calculated as the ratio of the sum of the powers in the adjacent channels to the power in the assigned channel, usually expressed in decibels (dB). A lower CACLR value indicates better performance, meaning less power is leaking into neighboring bands. The exact number of adjacent channels considered and the required limit values are specified per radio access technology (RAT), frequency band, and channel bandwidth.

CACLR's role is fundamental in the network's physical layer performance. It directly impacts the capacity and quality of service in multi-operator and multi-carrier environments. High CACLR can cause significant interference to receivers in adjacent channels, degrading their signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) and leading to dropped calls, reduced data throughput, and inefficient spectrum utilization. By enforcing strict CACLR requirements, 3GPP ensures that base stations and devices can coexist in the same geographical area without causing unacceptable degradation to each other's services. This is particularly vital for Time Division Duplex (TDD) deployments, where base stations may transmit simultaneously on adjacent channels, and for Carrier Aggregation (CA) scenarios where a device or base station aggregates multiple component carriers that are closely spaced in frequency.

Purpose & Motivation

CACLR was introduced to address the limitations of single-channel ACLR measurements in modern, spectrum-congested cellular networks. As networks evolved from single-carrier deployments to more complex architectures like Carrier Aggregation, network sharing, and dense small cell deployments, the potential for aggregated interference from a single transmitter into multiple nearby channels became a critical concern. A transmitter might pass individual ACLR tests for each adjacent channel but still generate a significant total amount of out-of-band emission when its leakage across several channels is combined. This cumulative effect could desensitize receivers operating on non-immediate adjacent channels, a scenario not adequately captured by traditional metrics.

The creation of CACLR was motivated by the need for a more holistic and realistic interference assessment tool. It solves the problem of ensuring predictable and manageable interference levels in real-world scenarios where multiple channels from the same or different operators are deployed in close spectral proximity. By setting a limit on the total unwanted power a transmitter can emit into a block of spectrum adjacent to its allocation, CACLR protects the overall integrity of the radio environment. This allows regulators and operators to pack channels more tightly, improving overall spectral efficiency and enabling higher network capacity, which is essential for meeting the growing demand for mobile broadband services. It represents an evolution in RF conformance testing from component-level analysis to system-level interference management.

Classification

Part ofACLR

Release Timeline

Detected Changes Across Releases

from 3GPP Change Requests

Specific changes extracted from the „Change history“ tables of 3GPP specifications (6 CRs across 1 releases). Complements the general historical overview above with the evidence-based evolution of this function.

Rel-18 6 changes

In Release 18, the specifications introduced clarifications and corrections to the Cumulative Adjacent Channel Leakage Ratio (CACLR) requirements for both LTE and NR base stations. The changes specifically defined the application of CACLR within sub-block gaps and Inter RF Bandwidth gaps of 20 MHz or larger, and established that the applicable limit is the less stringent option between the values in Table 6.7B and new absolute power limits defined per base station category (e.g., -13 dBm/MHz for Wide Area Category A). Furthermore, it was specified that for UTRA carriers adjacent to these gaps, the CACLR must be higher than the Table 6.7B value.

  • CR to 37.104: Correction to ACLR and CACLR requirement TS 37.104CR0991
  • CR to 37.141: Correction to ACLR and CACLR requirement TS 37.141CR1061
  • CR to 37.145-2: Correction to ACLR and CACLR requirement TS 37.145CR0362
  • CR to 38.104: Correction to ACLR and CACLR requirement TS 38.104CR0496
  • CR to 38.104: Correction to ACLR and CACLR requirement TS 38.104CR0508
  • (NR_6GHz_unlic_EU-Core) CR to 38.104 on ACLR and CACLR in non-contiguous spectrum TS 38.104CR0650

Explore further

Broader topics and technologies where CACLR plays a role.

Defining Specifications

3GPP specifications that define or reference CACLR, with the latest known release. Sourced from the 3GPP document catalog — see methodology.

SpecificationTitleRelease
TS 25.104 vj00 UTRA FDD Base Station RF Characteristics Rel-19
TS 25.141 vj00 UTRA FDD Base Station RF Conformance Testing Rel-19
TS 36.104 vj10 Base Station (BS) radio transmission and reception Rel-19
TS 36.141 vj00 E-UTRA BS Conformance Testing Rel-19
TS 37.104 vj10 MSR Base Station RF Characteristics Rel-19
TS 37.105 vj10 AAS Base Station Transmission & Reception Requirements Rel-19
TS 37.141 vj10 RF Test Methods for Multi-Standard Radio Base Stations Rel-19
TS 37.145 vj10 AAS Base Station Conducted Conformance Testing Rel-19
TS 37.802 va10 MSR BS RF Requirements for Non-Contiguous Spectrum Rel-10
TS 37.809 vb00 E-UTRA & MSR BS Class Requirements Rel-11
TS 37.812 vb30 Multi-band Multi-standard Radio BS Requirements Rel-11
TR 37.843 vf70 AAS BS Radiated RF Requirement Background Rel-15
TR 37.941 vj20 RF Conformance Testing Background for Radiated BS Requirements Rel-19
TS 38.104 vj20 NR Base Station RF Requirements Rel-19
TS 38.106 vj20 NR Repeater Radio Transmission and Reception Rel-19
TS 38.115 vj20 NR Repeater RF Conformance Testing Part 1 Rel-19
TS 38.141 vj20 NR Base Station RF Conformance Testing Part 1 Rel-19
TS 38.174 vj10 NR Integrated Access and Backhaul Radio Spec Rel-19
TS 38.176 vj20 IAB Conformance Testing Specification Rel-19
TS 38.817 3GPP TR 38.817 Rel-10
Patrick Zandl

About the author: Patrick Zandl (b. 1974)

Telecommunications specialist, technology journalist (founder of the Mobil server), and developer who has been running since 2025 — the largest Czech-language resource on AI-assisted programming. Formerly Chief Wizard Architect at Prusa3D and head of development for Turris at CZ.NIC; currently a consultant and instructor on AI implementation in companies.